Summary
We’d like to propose a Chinese-language research and education kit covering CoW Protocol’s intent-based trading architecture and MEV protection. The kit would include an in-depth research report, visual explainers, and a bilingual glossary — all open-source (CC0).
Motivation
- Strategic fit (CIP-82 2026 mandate): user/developer onboarding + MEV protection are two of the three mandate themes. In-depth Chinese-language material on CoW’s mechanism is nearly non-existent today.
- Sourcing: we noted the Grants Committee’s openly stated sourcing challenge — the same few teams reply to every RFP. We’re a new team and would like to contribute net-new coverage to a new language community.
- No conflict with the Translation RFP: long-form content was explicitly out of scope for the UI Translation RFP (Phase 1); this proposal is additive. The glossary deliverable is designed to be reusable for a potential Phase 2 (e.g., Chinese UI localization).
Scope & Deliverables
- D1 — Research report (Chinese): CoW auction mechanism, solver competition, CoW matching, MEV Blocker design, plus a practical user guide. Published CC0.
- D2 — 10 infographics + 3 short-video scripts (Chinese) derived from the report.
- D3 — EN→ZH glossary (~200 terms), structured for reuse in future localization work.
Milestones (8 weeks total)
- M1 (weeks 1–2): outline + glossary v1
- M2 (weeks 3–6): report draft + infographics
- M3 (weeks 7–8): final report + community review round
Budget: $8,000–$12,000 (stablecoins), paid per milestone.
Team: We’re a newly formed research/content team focused on Chinese-language coverage of DAO governance and DeFi mechanisms. We don’t claim prior CoW grants history — we’re new, and we see that as the point: bringing a new audience and a new language community into the CoW ecosystem. We recently completed a multi-DAO research survey (in Chinese) and can share a writing sample on request.
Questions for the committee and community
- Does this fit current grant priorities?
- Any preferences on report depth/format, or on the glossary structure?
- Would the glossary be useful input for a future Translation Phase 2?
Looking forward to your feedback before we submit a formal application.