I understand how hard/onchain cancellation works (atomics :-P), and I even understand the soft/offchain cancellation “race condition” where a solver just barely solves milliseconds before the cancellation can be processed… BUT what prevents a solver from just completely ignoring your cancellation request in the first place??? I mean you’ve already given them signed permission to execute the trade… and solvers have an incentive to ignore your cancellation request for: (1) more solver rewards (2) more liquidity to match against (3) more surplus capture)… and as we all know solvers/MEV will do anything they can to get more profits (such as overbidding). Do soft cancellations really just rely on the good graces of solvers to not execute the trade? I don’t see how that would ever work (I guess that’s what onchain cancellation is for…)
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bounty program for Balancer + CoW Swap integration | 3 | 1106 | June 12, 2023 | |
Move Solver Rewards Mechanism from Theory to Practice | 3 | 643 | November 30, 2023 | |
CIP-7: Allowing External Solvers | 12 | 2124 | May 5, 2022 | |
[research] Beyond batch auctions | 0 | 96 | August 23, 2024 | |
Implementing a solver using private liquidity | 2 | 2887 | May 31, 2022 |