CIP-Draft: General Authorisation & Confidence Mandate to Sell CoW DAO’s Stake in MEV Blocker

CIP-73
Title: General Authorisation & Confidence Mandate to Sell CoW DAO’s Stake in MEV Blocker
Author(s): Kowrigan
Status: Voting
Created: 2025-10-22

Simple Summary

This CIP asks CoW DAO to reaffirm the mandate that the core team, through CoW Foundation and its subsidiaries, has to negotiate and execute a sale of MEV Blocker on CoW DAO’s behalf.

Motivation

MEV Blocker was jointly launched in collaboration with beaverbuild.org in April 2023. MEV Blocker extended CoW DAO’s mission to protect crypto users from bad outcomes and, in a very short time, gained significant traction (frequently topping 4% of all Ethereum transactions). The project has also benefited CoW DAO financially, generating over 1680 ETH (split between CoW DAO and beaverbuild.org) in under 2.5 years.

Despite its success, recent exciting developments in the DEX market have led the core team to prioritise their time on the growth and development of CoW DAO’s original two products: CoW Protocol and CoW Swap. This, coupled with the fact that core team members have been approached by interested buyers over the lifespan of MEV Blocker, have led to the conclusion that now might be a good time to explore a sale of MEV Blocker on behalf of CoW DAO.

A sale of CoW DAO’s stake in MEV Blocker at a fair price would streamline operations, reduce non-core overhead, and convert MEV Blocker’s current value into treasury assets that can be reinvested toward developing CoW DAO’s core business.

A sale to a qualified team – one with the interest, energy, and skillset needed to steward the development of MEV Blocker far into the future – is in the best interest of CoW DAO, given the high degree of trust that users, searchers, and builders have placed in the product to-date.

CoW Foundation and its subsidiaries have an implicit mandate to act in the strategic best interest of the DAO at all times. However, given the significance that a sale of a business interest can have on the strategic direction of the DAO, and given the need for discretion when sharing sensitive business information during any M&A process, CoW Foundation is asking CoW DAO to reaffirm its mandate to solicit qualified buyers for MEV Blocker, negotiate favorable terms, and ultimately authorise a sale of MEV Blocker on behalf of CoW DAO.

Scope & Definitions

  • MEV Blocker Activity: the commercial/business activity branded “MEV Blocker,” including brand/domain(s), documentation, commercial materials, operational know-how, customer/partner relationships, and any Foundation-owned systems, data, and accounts used exclusively for that activity.

  • Foundation Assets: any rights, data, and materials owned or controlled by the Foundation or its controlled entities that are specific to the MEV Blocker Activity.

  • Excluded: DAO governance systems, CoW-wide shared infrastructure, COW-token-specific systems, and any third-party assets not owned/controlled by the Foundation.

Specification

Passage of this CIP authorises CoW Foundation (or a designated controlled affiliate) to market, negotiate, and sell CoW DAO’s 50% stake in MEV Blocker to one or more buyer(s), at the best-obtainable terms, and to remit CoW DAO’s share of net proceeds to the CoW DAO Treasury. This is a community confidence mandate acknowledging the Foundation’s capacity to execute such a sale while explicitly endorsing the disposal.

  • Authority to Sell.
    The DAO authorises CoW Foundation (the “Implementation Entity”), or a designated controlled affiliate, to:
    (a) solicit indications of interest, run a sale process, negotiate, and enter into one or more definitive agreements (e.g., asset purchase, assignment, or else) for the sale of Foundation Assets comprising the MEV Blocker Activity; and
    (b) take all ancillary steps customary for such transactions (diligence, assignments, filings, and transitions).

  • Guardrails & Protections.

    • No sale of DAO governance artifacts or CoW-wide shared infra.

    • No exclusivity or covenants that restrict the future development of CoW Protocol.

    • Liabilities: the Foundation shall not assume new material liabilities post-closing beyond customary transaction obligations (escrow, reps, and limited indemnities).

    • The Implementation Entity shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain a market value for the MEV Blocker Activity in an arm’s-length transaction, taking into account price and overall terms (certainty, speed to close, conditionality, risk allocation, and post-closing obligations).

  • Proceeds & Funds Flow.

    • CoW DAO’s share of net cash proceeds (after customary closing costs/escrows) shall be transferred to the CoW DAO Treasury at 0x616dE58c011F8736fa20c7Ae5352F7f6FB9F0669 on Ethereum Mainnet.

    • Any consideration not attributable to Foundation Assets (e.g., third-party assets) shall be paid directly or indirectly to the relevant third party per buyer arrangements. The Foundation does not guarantee third-party deliverables.

  • Reporting & Transparency.

    • Within 15 business days after the closing, the Foundation will post a closing notice on the forum, summarising: (i) what was transferred (high-level), (ii) headline consideration form(s) (cash/equity/earn-out) with numbers redacted if necessary, and (iii) the amount remitted to the DAO Treasury.
  • Authority Scope; Non-Material Changes.

    • Foundation directors are empowered to execute, deliver, and perform the definitive agreements and to make non-material changes that do not reduce total consideration or increase post-closing obligations beyond customary limits.

Rationale

  • The DAO’s core priority is CoW Protocol and CoW Swap and there is a large, achievable opportunity to accelerate the core business with focused effort on product and growth (e.g. through network expansion, partnership development, and the deployment of CoW Protocol v2); divesting a non-core activity improves strategic focus and capital efficiency.

  • The Foundation already serves as the DAO’s legal interface and treasury implementer; this CIP provides a clear, community-backed mandate of confidence to execute a sale process and finalise a transaction on buyer-agnostic, best-terms basis.

  • Proceeds strengthen the DAO Treasury, supporting core roadmap execution.

Security & Compliance Considerations

No custodial user funds are implicated. Standard transactional diligence, data-transfer compliance, and sanctions checks apply.

4 Likes

I would like to express my support of this CIP. It feels like the right move at the right time.

Allowing the team to focus 100% on core products like CoW Protocol and CoW Swap is super beneficial for long-term success. Plus, divesting MEV Blocker now brings in revenue that can directly support the DAO’s operations and fund all the exciting growth planned.

1 Like

Supporting this proposal.
As the DeFi market becomes more competitive, I feel that the Core team focusing on the core DeFi products is key to ensure longer term profitability and growth potential to CoW DAO.

Also, having the treasury build up will allow for further growth and research initiatives to be pursued.

1 Like

This proposal sounds smart to me, and in the interests of CoW DAO. I especially like the focus on finding a qualified team to steward the product for existing users.

1 Like

Well at what price? It is hard to decide whether selling shares is worth without knowing the minimum price cow dao is asking.

3 Likes

Thank you @Karolak, that’s a fair question, and one that we’ve deliberately left open at this stage.

Because MEV Blocker is a unique asset with no direct market comparables, setting a minimum price would risk either anchoring negotiations too low or deterring qualified bidders before we’ve had a chance to gauge genuine market interest.

The goal of this CIP is not to pre-approve a specific transaction but to reaffirm the Foundation’s mandate to run a structured sale process on behalf of the DAO engaging with potential buyers, benchmarking valuation ranges, and negotiating terms in the DAO’s best interest.

Once a serious offer materialises, the Foundation will report back to the community with a high-level summary of the outcome, including proceeds remitted to the DAO Treasury, ensuring transparency without compromising the confidentiality required in commercial negotiations.

In short: this CIP asks the DAO to approve the process and mandate , not to fix a price before discovery. The Foundation’s fiduciary duty is to secure fair market value through competitive, arm’s-length discussions.

1 Like

The CIP only mentions that the funds will go to the Treasury. Is there already a plan or proposal in mind for how these funds might be used?
For example, would the team or DAO considered allocating part of this extra funds in case of a sell to buy and burn COW tokens, as a way to strengthen the token economy while still keeping enough liquidity for future initiatives?

1 Like

I voted FOR

I find it quite strange that there is no minimum valuation for the project.

However, It seems to me that the Foundation is also interested in selling at a high price, since the DAO could use these funds to finance their activities and grants for protocol development, among other things.
The Foundation also bears reputational and legal risks if a bona fide transaction is not reached.

1 Like

Hi @valloderbabo ,
The current treasury strategy is to ensure 28M USD in stables for DAO runway, which are used for yield farming (further update to be made in a separate post). The goal is to ensure there is sufficient funds for 2 years of development and maintenance, Grants, and Foundation running.

This CIP specifically asks for a mandate to “go to market”, and as discussed in Discord, in the Core Team view we should focus on maximising here the value to the DAO, get the deal done. Parallel to this, let’s continue the discussions on value distribution and tokenholder alignment.

1 Like