Voting Actions December 15th - 19th
Proposal: CIP-78: Dissolve Sprinter Bonding Pool
Vote: For
Reasoning: We support this proposal because Sprinter is pausing solver operations, the pool has already unvouched and denylisted solvers, and dissolving the bonding pool simply returns capital to its original funders, preventing idle funds from remaining locked in an inactive mandate while maintaining clean and reversible treasury accounting.
Proposal: CIP-79: Continued funding for Development Services - Service Agreement No 5. V2
Vote: For
Reasoning: We supported the previous version of this proposal, and our reasoning remains the same.
Proposal: CIP-80: CoW DAO Grants 2026 Renewal
Vote: For
Reasoning: We support this proposal because it preserved an already-approved grants mandate under CIP-63 while improving capital efficiency through quarterly releases and introducing a capped, transparent fee model, maintaining strong alignment with protocol priorities without expanding risk to the DAO, and ensuring that existing funds and future top-ups followed a reversible, well-structured process grounded in actual deployment rates and cooperative governance design.
Proposal: CIP-81: Whitelist “Generalized Wrappers” as Solvers
Vote: For
Reasoning: We support this proposal because it formally recognized Generalized Wrappers as a scalable and standardized execution layer for complex DeFi-intent settlement, enabling protocol expansion beyond custom solver integrations while keeping the whitelisting mandate tightly scoped to the Euler pilot, and embedding strong, non-upgradable, deterministic, and audited security constraints that maintain solver accountability without imposing unnecessary bonds on immutable infrastructure, ultimately strengthening protocol safety and long-term extensibility.