CIP-76: Continued funding for development services - Service Agreement No 5

Governance
7

Thank you @m0xt , also great to have you involved in the ongoing discussions!

Regarding the platforms, there have been providers proposing 10k-30k yearly subscriptions, which as DevCo we felt are too expensive / not in the budget for our service agreements. As you’ve actually built one dashboard, I think it might be a Grants DAO oriented request. If the community shows this need further, we would need to increase slightly the overall budget for this service agreement.

Regarding the token release schedule, I’ll try to support, but think this is lateral to the current CIP.

  1. Coingecko Supply - We’ve built the Github repository from where Coingecko is feed. This repository has been made open-source. Note: Currently the Foundation wallets are excluded for Mainnet, meaning that tokens bridged will count towards circulating supply.

  2. DAO-Owned Circulating Supply (Unallocated) - All Foundation level wallets are considered non-circulating supply.

3. DAO-Owned Non-Circulating Supply (Unallocated) - The amounts in CoW DAO wallet.

4. DAO-Owned Non-Circulating Supply (Allocated) - All tokens allocated to purpose specific wallets, have specific mandates, e.g.:

  1. CoW Grants DAO, COW earmarked to Grants

  2. Treasury - COW earmarked for raising funds / partnerships (as per my previous message and CIP-62

  3. Buyback wallet - Committed to fund ongoing solver rewards

  4. Solver rewards wallet - Operational funds to pay next week’s rewards.

I would be happy to liaise with you on Discord, and define a wider framework to include in the CoW Foundation Transparency report (aimed to be delivered at the end of Feb).

2 Likes