We appreciate the idea of granting the Core Treasury Team flexibility in reallocating the 80M COW tokens, but we would like more clarity on exactly when DAO approval is required and when decisions can be made unilaterally by the Treasury team.
For example, under CIP-24, funding for core development was proposed and discussed in the forum. Will similar proposals continue to be brought to the DAO, or does the Treasury team now have the authority to allocate these funds on its own discretion?
Given the large scale of this allocation—significantly bigger than what was introduced in CIP-19, we believe it is crucial to clearly define how the DAO retains oversight and ensures transparency around how and when these funds are deployed.
Additionally, could you let us know if the fee structure and multisig configuration are still the same as in CIP-19, or if there have been any changes?