# CIP-17: Making slippage symmetric

**URL:** <https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-17-making-slippage-symmetric/1291>\
**Category:** Closed Proposals\
**Tags:** cip, proposal, successful\
**Created:** [December 7, 2022, 1:46pm UTC](https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-17-making-slippage-symmetric/1291 "2022-12-07T13:46:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![middleway.eth](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.cow.fi/middleway.eth/32/12_2.png) [@middleway.eth](https://forum.cow.fi/u/middleway.eth)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2022, 1:56pm UTC](https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-17-making-slippage-symmetric/1291/15 "2022-12-27T13:56:59Z")

</div>

Sorry to nitpick on this, but would appreciate if you can fit the proposal into the formal [CIP template](https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-0-template/28).

There are no formal rules for dealing with CIPs that deviate from the standard format, so it shouldn’t change anything about the CIP process.

But I think it is a good practice to use the format for better readability and orderly review of CIPs.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-17-making-slippage-symmetric/1291)._