# CIP-14: Risk-adjusted solver rewards

**URL:** <https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-14-risk-adjusted-solver-rewards/1132>\
**Category:** Closed Proposals\
**Tags:** cip, proposal, successful\
**Created:** [September 9, 2022, 3:04pm UTC](https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-14-risk-adjusted-solver-rewards/1132 "2022-09-09T15:04:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomatosoup](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.cow.fi/tomatosoup/32/590_2.png) [@tomatosoup](https://forum.cow.fi/u/tomatosoup)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2022, 4:15pm UTC](https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-14-risk-adjusted-solver-rewards/1132/30 "2022-10-22T16:15:41Z")

</div>

I’ve mentioned this before but what do people think about replacing T with the gap between the first and second solvers’ objectives? That would solve a lot of the problems around pennying and incentivizing solvers properly while also being simpler to implement and understand than things like the auction scheme. Would be interesting to see some simulations on this!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cow.fi/t/cip-14-risk-adjusted-solver-rewards/1132)._